In our time, it was the liberal Bill Clinton who sent bombers over Baghdad as soon as he came into office, who first raised the specter of "weapons of mass destruction" as a justification for a series of bombing attacks on Iraq. Liberals today criticize George Bush's unilateralism. But it was Clinton's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, who told the United Nations Security Council that the U.S. would act "multilaterally when we can, unilaterally when we must."This is Bill Clinton arrogantly exclaiming that, “there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America.”
Some political conservatives scapegoat drug sellers and users, clapping them in prison and sacrificing them upon the altar of public opinion. Some religious conservatives scapegoat homosexuals, declaring AIDS to be "God's punishment." Then some homosexuals scapegoat their critics as "homophobes" because they criticize dangerous behavior. Many want to scapegoat, and others, self-deluded, self-righteously believe they are scapegoated. Everyone is always pointing their finger at someone else, forgetting the truth of the saying, "Take the log out of your own eye before you worry about the speck in your brother's."And…
Actually, if you took the scapegoating out of inherently scapegoating philosophies -- such as socialism, leftism and liberalism (with its "us vs. them" attitude and politics of class envy), they would all collapse. Leftism is indeed ultimately based on envy -- everyone is supposed to be "equal" to avoid that envy. But only that which is identical is equal. Two quarters are equal because they are identical. This, obviously, doesn't apply to people, unless you stick them on some Procrustean rack.Of course, why use a minority as a scapegoat when you can just use your enemies. Remember Shrillary and her “vast right-wing conspiracy” comment?
WOW...that's one nappy-headed ho alright!
For those of you who don’t know Crystal, she is the nappy-headed ho who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse players of rape.
The way I see it, anyone who knowingly falsely accuses someone of a crime should go to prison for as long as the accused would have had they been convicted. Since she accused three guys, she should probably get life in prison.
This would be a great deterrent from future nappy-headed ho’s behaving in a similar manner.
American Sex Lives 2004, a new "Primetime Live" sex poll conducted in conjunction with the ABC News Polling Unit, is among the most comprehensive surveys of its kind in decades and establishes a new, detailed picture of sex attitudes and behavior in America today.Here are the results:
April is currently tracking as the coldest April in 113 years - a dramaticWHAT KIND OF MIND GAMES IS HE PLAYING WITH US!
change from last years #1 warmest ever. Even after some late month moderation,
April 2007 will likely keep the month in the top 7 coldest in history.
…the economy added 180,000 new jobs, dropping unemployment to a 4.4 percent rate that matched a five-year low.Geez this economy sucks…so does G-Dub. I hate him so much! More from the article:
The rate for women held steady at 3.8 percent. The rate for men declined to 4 percent.
I’m not an expert statistician, but if the unemployment rate is 4% for men and 3.8% for women, how is the overall unemployment rate 4.4%? Oh...I forgot about the transgender freaks.
The unemployment rate for Hispanics dropped to 5.1 percent, a three-month low,
while the rate for blacks climbed to 8.3 percent, a three-month high.
Hmmmm…I wonder why this article doesn’t mention the unemployment rate for Asians? Actually…no I don’t. The reason they don’t mention the Asian unemployment rate is because it goes against the liberal media storyline of discrimination against minorities. Blacks and Hispanics have above average unemployment (so says the media and popular opinion) because of racism and lack of opportunity.
Unfortunately, Asians are more successful financially than whites. This obviously instantly defeats any argument used by libs regarding racism holding down minorities. That is, unless every single white person in the country got a memo that said to discriminate against blacks and Hispanics, but to leave Asians alone. I think the truth is clear, but rather than change their talking points, the libs simply ignore the fact of Asian success.
So why do blacks and Hispanics struggle financially? The answer is simple, but is too politically incorrect to mention in most places. However, here at the Conservative Bastion, we have the cojones to tell the truth.
The main difference is cultural values.
Being fully exposed to all cultures in America, let me enlighten you to the differences. *Note* these are generalized differences.
Asians and whites expect their children to go to college.
Blacks and Hispanics do not.
Blacks and Hispanics are more likely to grow up without a father.
Whites and Asians tend to have a father in the home.
Whites and Asians stress learning proper English.
Blacks and Hispanics do not. Every black person that I have ever known that spoke English well told me they were given crap for it by other blacks. They were often told something along the lines of, “you speak like a white person”. This is not a compliment.
This kind of attitude illustrates a major problem with blacks. If being educated makes you white, and white is bad…then you are screwed.
Hispanics…where to begin! I don’t know if it is out of pride or what, but these people like to hang on to the old language. They have duped the whole country into the idea that knowing two languages is a good thing. Frankly it is a waste of time unless you are an international businessperson or a translator.
A simplified language that every citizen can easily learn is what separates primitive cultures from civilized ones. If you have to go to school for years to learn the language(s) of the land, then you are wasting time, money, and human labor. Let’s face it, not that many Americans of any color are great at English. Average people have a hard enough time with one language. There is no point in having two.
To summarize…if you want to be successful in America, go to college, learn proper English, don’t have children in an uncommitted relationship (i.e. save it for marriage) and stop making so many fucking excuses.
If you can’t figure out a way to pay for college, then you are probably to stupid to make it in life anyways.
On the economy, just 38 percent approve of the president's stewardship while 60 percent disapprove, the poll shows.Proving Americans, despite living in the best country God gave man, lack basic reasoning skills. Stumble It!
Today, one of the most powerful religions in the Western World is environmentalism. Environmentalism seems to be the religion of choice for urban atheists. Why do I say it's a religion? Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remapping of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and myths.
There's an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there's a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all. We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability. Sustainability is salvation in the church of the environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide-free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs, imbibe.
Eden, the fall of man, the loss of grace, the coming doomsday---these are deeply held mythic structures. They are profoundly conservative beliefs. They may even be hard-wired in the brain, for all I know. I certainly don't want to talk anybody out of them, as I don't want to talk anybody out of a belief that Jesus Christ is the son of God who rose from the dead. But the reason I don't want to talk anybody out of these beliefs is that I know that I can't talk anybody out of them. These are not facts that can be argued. These are issues of faith.
And so it is, sadly, with environmentalism. Increasingly it seems facts aren't necessary, because the tenets of environmentalism are all about belief. It's about whether you are going to be a sinner, or saved. Whether you are going to be one of the people on the side of salvation, or on the side of doom. Whether you are going to be one of us, or one of them.
Am I exaggerating to make a point? I am afraid not. Because we know a lot more about the world than we did forty or fifty years ago. And what we know now is not so supportive of certain core environmental myths, yet the myths do not die. Let's examine some of those beliefs.
There is no Eden. There never was. What was that Eden of the wonderful mythic past? Is it the time when infant mortality was 80%, when four children in five died of disease before the age of five? When one woman in six died in childbirth? When the average lifespan was 40, as it was in America a century ago. When plagues swept across the planet, killing millions in a stroke. Was it when millions starved to death? Is that when it was Eden?
White House Advisor Karl Rove was the target of a protest on the American University campus Tuesday night, News4 reported.I have two points:
Rove was on the campus to talk to the College Republicans, but when he got outside more than a dozen students began throwing things at his car, an American University spokesperson said.
"I believe that is one of the principal reasons why political leaders around the world have not yet taken action," Gore said. "There are many reasons, but one of the principal reasons in my view is more than half of the mainstream media have rejected the scientific consensus implicitly — and I say 'rejected,' perhaps it's the wrong word. They have failed to report that it is the consensus and instead have chosen … balance as bias.I think I understand why liberals hate Fox News so much now. Balance is bias. Of course!
"I don't think that any of the editors or reporters responsible for one of these stories saying, 'It may be real, it may not be real,' is unethical.In other words, giving both sides of the story is now bias. You must only report what Al Gore wants reported. Anything else is unethical. All hail King Gore – his word is law. Don’t you dare question him.
On her blog at Rosie.com, Ro accused [Bill] O'Reilly of being a totalitarian puppet of News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch, as she put it, in her lower-case verse, "like 1984/molding the facts/2 suit the needs/of big brother rupert." And Rosie also revealed that when she and co-host Joy Behar made reference on "The View" to a sex scandal involving O'Reilly, they were told they had to can it about O'Reilly or else "bill o would 'go after' all the hosts" of their show.Comments like this really annoy me. This is coming from someone who says they are liberal. Liberals love to talk about how nice and understanding and nuanced they are. However, comments like this show that the concept of liberal understanding, tolerance, and niceness are over hyped.
…radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America.If by radical, you mean people who are willing to kill civilians to advance a political cause, then of course she is right. In which case, radical lesbianism would be just as much a threat to this country and radical Islam.