Conservative Bastion
The only blog that can factually claim to shift the Bell Curve, along with the hearts & minds of America, to the right.
Monday, April 30, 2007
Anti-American Parade Day
Tomorrow is May 1st and the day that ungrateful illegals have chosen to arrogantly “protest” for immigration reform and labor rights.

Last year I wrote about the top 10 reasons to clamp down on illegal immigration. This year, I will give advice to the illegals because – unbeknownst to them – those protests hurt their cause. Apathetic Americans, like myself, were turned into rabid anti-illegal immigrant fanatics after their classless display last year. They are going about this all wrong and here is what they should do.

Get rid of your Mexican flags. I’ll be frank, if my family had waved the flags of the USSR or the Philippines they would been laughed at. Why would you be proud of a country that has screwed you over? That really is the key question.

If these people wanted and deserved to be Americans, they wouldn’t have had to be told to wave American flags instead of Mexican flags. The fact is that many of these people are Mexicans first (among other nationalities).

No matter what anyone says, waving a foreign flag in a domestic protest can only be viewed one way: arrogant. Can you imagine the spring break college kids bringing all their American flags to Mexico and then protesting against ANYTHING whilst obnoxiously waving their flags? It makes me sick just thinking about it.

The illegals and their supporters should not have protested at all. Some may think that is crazy, but anyone who listens to what President Bush has actually said on the subject knows that Bush is practically the first Hispanic president.

It is really awkward and embarrassing that so many Hispanics could be so hostile to their greatest ally. Maybe if they learned English they would understand what it is he actually wants to do.

Instead they thought they would get all activist on us and make a difference. Not smart. Now they are getting deported in larger numbers than they were before the protests.

Don’t play the race card on this one either. That is a dumb cop out. After searching the headlines at Google for 3 seconds, I found a story about a crack down on illegal Albanians.

The fact is that white illegals are non-existent. When there is a crack down on white-collar crime, people don’t say the prosecutors are anti-white. Please use common sense.

My advice to the illegals is simple

• Learn English

• Work hard

• Don’t collect welfare

• Only have as many kids as you can take care of – this takes into regard both money and time

• Get an education and make sure your kids get one

• Love America

If you do that, you should be fine. Anything else just pisses us off. 
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Friday, April 27, 2007
Was Bill Clinton a Nazi?
The point has been made over the past few years that President George W. Bush is a Nazi/Fascist. This is the typical rhetoric of childish liberals who cannot conjure a legitimate argument against a political opponent, thus resorting to baseless name calling.

However, some have tried to legitimize this claim by describing the main features of fascism and giving examples of how President Bush and Republicans have met those standards.

You can find one such article here. However, upon a brief review of this list, the Conservative Bastion has realized that these arguments could easily be made about any and every American president. Naturally, we decided to take the article verbatim, and write a rebuttal using President Clinton’s record in order to paint him as a fascist. Do we really think he is a fascist? No. Our point is to show how easy an argument like this is to make. Furthermore, if this is the standard that a liberal would use to call someone a fascist, then their beloved first black president, B.J. Clinton, is a Hitler incarnate.

Here goes nothing:

1.) Powerful and Continuing Nationalism

Whether you like to admit it or not, nationalism has always been strong in America. The one exception may be during the Vietnam era, although nationalism still existed.

This is the liberal god Howard Zinn himself - accusing the Clinton administration of harmful nationalism.
In our time, it was the liberal Bill Clinton who sent bombers over Baghdad as soon as he came into office, who first raised the specter of "weapons of mass destruction" as a justification for a series of bombing attacks on Iraq. Liberals today criticize George Bush's unilateralism. But it was Clinton's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, who told the United Nations Security Council that the U.S. would act "multilaterally when we can, unilaterally when we must."
This is Bill Clinton arrogantly exclaiming that, “there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America.”

Pure American arrogance. He seems to be saying that America is the all-knowing beacon of truth in the world and that we could not possibly learn anything from a foreigner. Just sickening.

2.) Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights

Anyone who has been alive and conscience knows that the biggest violation of human rights in the United States over the last 20 years occurred in Waco, Texas at the hands of the federal government. The unadulterated murder of unarmed men, women and children by government is inexcusable in any country, but is especially disturbing when it occurs in the country that is supposed to be the freest in the world.

Not to mention, the crimes against humanity perpetuated by the Clinton administration in North Korea, Iraq, among other places.

Not to mention, his domestic spying.

3.) Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause

I know Democrats and liberals like to pretend that Republicans have all these scapegoats they blame for everything. First of all, even if the point has any credence at all, it is not at the level of anything in Nazi Germany (so why call Bush a Nazi when the comparison is extremely insensitive and unwarranted). The only president ever to approach that type of oppression in modern America is FDR with the interment of the Japanese.

More recently, Democrats have turned to the wealthy, large corporations, and “extremist Christians” (see Waco Massacre) as a source of scapegoating.

Of course there is the Microsoft situation. What a shock...Democrats scapegoating large corporations...NO WAY!

More on scapegoating
Some political conservatives scapegoat drug sellers and users, clapping them in prison and sacrificing them upon the altar of public opinion. Some religious conservatives scapegoat homosexuals, declaring AIDS to be "God's punishment." Then some homosexuals scapegoat their critics as "homophobes" because they criticize dangerous behavior. Many want to scapegoat, and others, self-deluded, self-righteously believe they are scapegoated. Everyone is always pointing their finger at someone else, forgetting the truth of the saying, "Take the log out of your own eye before you worry about the speck in your brother's."
And…
Actually, if you took the scapegoating out of inherently scapegoating philosophies -- such as socialism, leftism and liberalism (with its "us vs. them" attitude and politics of class envy), they would all collapse. Leftism is indeed ultimately based on envy -- everyone is supposed to be "equal" to avoid that envy. But only that which is identical is equal. Two quarters are equal because they are identical. This, obviously, doesn't apply to people, unless you stick them on some Procrustean rack.
Of course, why use a minority as a scapegoat when you can just use your enemies. Remember Shrillary and her “vast right-wing conspiracy” comment?

This is a classic example of political hack blaming someone else for a scandal that they brought on themselves. Rather than saying, "my husband is a sexual deviant that needs some psychiatric treatment", she blames conservatives. Stand up job Shrillary...stand up job.

4.) Supremacy of the Military

This is almost laughable. Believe it or not, the US still had the most powerful military in the world when Clinton was president. This argument is much easier because there are so many liberals out there that have defended the way Clinton treated the military. So not only do I win this argument, I win it using the words of liberals. Also see here, here, and here.

5.) Rampant Sexism

Another laughable charge. B.J. Clinton is possibly the most sexist president in modern history. It is well documented in things like books. Sexual deviants tend to put sex before people. When you do that you tend to lack respect for the people you are engaging in sexual activity with. Since Clinton is a sex addict and gets sex whenever and from whomever he can, he presumably doesn’t respect any women. Don’t believe me, please read the following:

No respect for women whatsoever

Their Lives by: Candice Jackson

Why do feminists support Clinton?

6.) Controlled Mass Media

I am going to barf. Does anyone really argue against the idea that the news media has a strong liberal bias? Can anyone really argue otherwise? The fact that most liberals think Fox News is bias practically proves the point. Fact: there are more liberals on Fox than conservatives on all the other major TV outlets combined.

For additional info, read any of the following links:

Bernard Goldberg

Media admits they are liberal...

I think it is safe to say that if any politicians control or benefit from undue positive coverage by the mass media, it is most certainly liberals – not conservatives.

7.) Obsession with National Security

I don’t even know what this means. Obsessed with keeping the country safe…if that makes me a Nazi, sign me up. However, Clinton, to his credit, was obsessed with national security.

Pure obsession

So obsessed he had his former national security adviser steal classified documents out of the national archives in his pants.

Repeated bombing of Iraq


So desperate to bomb someone he bombed an aspirin factory

8.) Religion and Government are Intertwined

This is a tough one. Mostly because what constitutes a religion or a religious idea is debatable. One could argue it is anything that gives one a greater purpose or meaning in life. The fact is that morals and religious ideas permeate the American and every other government around the world. You cannot separate morals from law. The notion is absurd. That being said, one of the strongest and fastest growing new age religions – environmentalism – is very much pushed by the Democratic party through legislation and other government action.

Read more:

Environmentalism is a religion

Clinton institutes environmentalism as state religion

Attacks Bush for not keeping with his religious/fascist policies

Then of course, there is all the religious rhetoric that Clinton used in many of his speeches.

Does the fact that Clinton mentioned God in his speeches mean that religion and government are now intertwined?

No, but it is the standard the George W. Bush seems to be held to.

9.) Corporate Power is Protected

Who knows what this is supposed to mean, but believe it or not, all the corporations that are around today were around when Clinton was president too. Not to mention, all those corporate scandals in the early years of Bush’s presidency actually occurred with Billy was president. It wasn’t until they were brought to light under the all-knowing guidance of George W. Bush that these corporate criminals were prosecuted and convicted.

Capitalist/corporate pigs stole and connived under Clinton's watch and were brought to justice under GWB


Free trade, long thought of as pro-business and anti-worker, was one of Bill Clintons stronger points.


10.) Labor Power is Suppressed

More nonsense from the left, but labor didn’t do all that well in the 90’s for a variety of reasons.


11.) Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts

George W. Bush has greatly increased the spending for education at the federal level. A fact that is indisputable and one that actually upsets a lot of conservatives.

Meanwhile, Al Gore (Clinton's VP), has taken a strong stance against intellectual debate. The message has been picked up by the media outlets that they (Democrats/fascists) control.

12.) Obsession with Crime and Punishment

Oh those libs and their obsession with gun control…do I even need to post links for this?

Not to mention

Obsession


with crime and punishment

is evil

13.) Rampant Cronyism and Corruption

The Clinton Legacy:

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

More found here and here...

14. Fraudulent Elections

Republicans tend not to bitch as loudly and as obnoxiously as Democrats do, but there is just as much evidence that Clinton stole the 1996 election as there is that Bush stole 2000 or 2004.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The only conclusion I can come to after this careful and fair analysis of Billy “B.J.” Clinton and Democrats, is that they are just as much Nazi’s and fascist as any Republicans I know.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Thursday, April 26, 2007
MSNBC Hosts Moonbat Mania
I did my best to watch the Democratic debate on MSNBC tonight, but I had to quit after half of the participants stated by a show of hands that they did not believe in the global War on Terrorism.

To me, that is like saying, "I don't believe in the Cold War." Of course, some moonbats actually believe the Cold War was all hype too.

It's sad. No matter how much I would like to vote for someone other than a Republican, the Democratic candidates make it absolutely impossible.

Chris Dodd and Biden need to check into Dr. Kevorkian’s office.

Obama and Richardson are by far the most tolerable.

Hillary married a sexual deviant, which doesn’t say much about her judgment or her personal integrity.

Edwards actually made sense on a couple things tonight…unfortunately he promotes economic divisiveness and looks like a bobble head.

The last guy I had never seen before. He said something about getting rid of a standing army which I half way agree with, but since I don’t know his name, I will never know where to find more information about him.

My advice for Democrats running for president:

• Don’t talk about the president violating the constitution and then try to ban guns – it makes you look very dumb.

• Shut up about global warming. If you want to diversify our sources of energy, then do it, but don’t hide behind global warming. More importantly, don’t do something so drastic that if it turned out that global warming was a scam, you would be viewed as a complete failure. Any environmental policy should be based on hard facts rather than conjecture by some weatherman that lives in his mothers basement.

• Don’t be so negative. I know you hate the president, but you don’t need to turn every single question you answer about what you would do into something about how President Bush screwed up. Biden insinuated that Bush was responsible for the situation in North Korea. That is retarded.

• Don’t use socialism to solve our healthcare problem. Not only would it hurt our country, it is unnecessary. There are plenty of pro-market reforms our country can adopt that could help lower prices.

• Don’t raise taxes. Why would you even think that is an option? 2.5 trillion in tax revenues isn’t enough?

• Shut up about your homosexual and other social agendas and let the states decide. Not only is it constitutional, but it is the path of least resistance.

Some of you readers are probably thinking that I am basically asking for them to be Republican. That is not true. They could easily follow my guidelines, get their agenda done (the reasonable part) and not be so divisive while doing it.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Glboal Warming - Doomsday Called Off
This is probably the best documentary on global warming that I have ever seen. If you are interested in hearing the argument against the Al Gore view of global warming, then I suggest you watch it.

Part I


Part II


Part III


Part IV


Part V
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Death Stats in America
Some basic statistics on death in America. These statistics are from 2003 and 2004 and can be found here on the CDC website.

Top 15 Causes of Death in America

1. Heart Disease……………………………………………………654,092 deaths
2. Malignant neoplasms…………………………………………550,270
3. Cerebrovascular diseases……………………………………150,147
4. Chronic lower respiratory diseases………………………123,884
5. Accidents (unintentional injuries)………………………108,694
6. Diabetes Mellitus…………………………………………………72,815
7. Alzheimer’s disease……………………………………………65,829
8. Influenza and pneumonia………………………………………61,472
9. Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis…………42,762
10. Septicemia…………………………………………………………33,464
11. Intentional self-harm (suicide)………………………………31,647
12. Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis…………………………26,549
13. Essential (primary) hypertension…………………………22,953
14. Parkinson’s disease………………………………………………18,018
15. Pneumonitis due to solids and liquids………………………16,959

Deaths by guns

Homicide 11,599
Suicide 16,859
Accidents 752

In other words, you are more likely to kill yourself with a gun than be murdered by one.

Also, you are at least four times more likely to die in a car accident that to be murdered by a gun.

It is easy to say we should ban guns, but if we do that, we should ban a host of other things we use daily.

Let’s ban junk food. No more soda. No more cookies. No more fast food restaurants.

Let’s ban tobacco and alcohol.

Let’s ban cars.

Let’s ban depressed people so that they can no longer kill themselves.

Banning a substance, object, or idea is not what we should do in a free society. We need to educate.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Nazis Outlaw Baby Murder
It's a bad day for liberals. They will no longer be able to murder unborn babies in their third trimester.

Those Nazis are always holding people down. How dare they take away the right of a mother to killer her child in her third trimester. She should be able to do that anytime she wants! I think George Bush just hates women and freedom…and he sucks.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
The Virginia Tech Massacre & Gun Control
By now you all know about the massacre that took place on the campus of Virginia Tech yesterday. Rather than regurgitate some of the facts of the case, I rather regurgitate some of the political arguments being made regarding this subject.

First there is the killer: Cho Seung-Hui, a permanent resident originally from South Korea. The first point to be made is obvious: we need to screen the people immigrating to this country. We need to check for IQ, education levels, physical diseases, psychological diseases, and ideological beliefs. None of this willy nilly everyone come in and get a job who can. That is how monkey’s conduct immigration policy, not the most powerful country in the history of the earth.

However the other subject that has come up is the one of gun control. “If only we banned guns, this wouldn’t have happened”, at least that’s what some people think. Only a reactionary could come to such an emotionally driven conclusion.

Gun control is a strange subject for the Conservative Bastion to write about. Unlike drug policy, abortion, gay marriage, tax policy, foreign policy, and even animal rights, this issue should not be debatable.

The reason it should not be debatable is because we are guaranteed the right to bare arms as American citizen. On top of that, it is arguably the most important right we have. Why is that? Because without the right to bare arms, this country would not exist. If the Found Fathers had not had guns with which to protect themselves, the British would not have given the 13 colonies up. Rather than being the lone superpower in the world that we are today, we would probably just be India-lite.

I know some of you aren’t convinced, so let me put it this way…

To all the people out there who hate President Bush, and there are a lot of you out there. Do you think the President is a Nazi or a fascist? Of course the Bastion thinks that is nonsense, but we are well aware that many out there believe that.

Here is some historical perspective for you…the Nazis, when they invaded France and other countries, confiscated all firearms. Why do you think that is? Do you think that is because they had the wellbeing of the people at the top of their priority list?

NO!

Firearms threaten centralized power. Without arms, there is no way for a person to protect themselves from abusive power.

We can clearly see that in American history in the South with blacks and the KKK.

All this talk about hunting and hunters is nonsense. This has nothing to do with hunting. The second amendment has nothing to do with hunting…at all…AT ALL.

The right to bare arms exists so that citizens can protect themselves against foreign and domestic threats, not so they can eat meat (although that is a positive byproduct of the right).

Furthermore, banning guns will not solve this problem. This attack occurred in a gun-free zone. A lot of good that gun-free zone did those students. The fact is, unless you can completely lockdown an area, a gun free zone makes no sense. For instance a courtroom is ok to keep “gun-free” because you can relatively easily control who comes in and who doesn’t, and you can search those who do enter the building.

However, that is much harder to do at the national and state level. In fact it is impossible. If we can smuggle humans and drugs across the border, then we could smuggle guns. So if America were to ban guns, the effect would be that all law abiding citizens (people you wouldn’t mine possessing a gun) would lose their guns. While all criminals would either keep their old guns or buy smuggled guns from Mexico.

This is an interesting point in itself. Many liberals are pro-drug legalization or de-criminalization. How you could come to that conclusion about drugs and not about guns is beyond me.

In conclusion remember this. Guns are an inanimate object. That means they aren’t inherently evil or good. Rather it depends on the individual using the object on how it is used.

So what is the answer to stop this kind of thing from happening again? First of all, you can’t stop this kind of thing from happening unless you live in a totalitarian state. However, the best way to minimize situations like this would be for the Federal government to adopt a concealed weapons program. The program would give people a tax incentive to go through a police type background check and screening process that would allow them (if they passed) to carry a concealed weapon with them at all times wherever they go. In effect, they would be off duty policemen and women.

They also may want to look at making it illegal for there to be a gun-free zone without some sort of perimeter and screening process set up. You don’t see people going on shooting rampages in military bases or at gun shows. They choose schools for a reason.

The last few years has brough us many debates over freedom vs. security. Liberals love to pretend to be the brave ones who stand on the side of freedom over security. Not this time. Frankly, I rather have President Bush wiretap every single phone I use for the next 20 years than give up the rights of Americans to bare arms for the next five.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Nappy-Headed Ho Should Get Prison Time
Conservative Bastion to Don Imus...come in Don Imus. This just in. Your nappy-headed ho comment from last week may have been out of line, but there is someone very deserving of that label this week. Her name is Crystal Gail Mangum.


WOW...that's one nappy-headed ho alright!

For those of you who don’t know Crystal, she is the nappy-headed ho who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse players of rape.

The way I see it, anyone who knowingly falsely accuses someone of a crime should go to prison for as long as the accused would have had they been convicted. Since she accused three guys, she should probably get life in prison.

This would be a great deterrent from future nappy-headed ho’s behaving in a similar manner.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Republicans Better in Bed
This is an older news story, but still relevant, and still very accurate:

American Sex Lives 2004, a new "Primetime Live" sex poll conducted in conjunction with the ABC News Polling Unit, is among the most comprehensive surveys of its kind in decades and establishes a new, detailed picture of sex attitudes and behavior in America today.
Here are the results:

Of those involved in a committed relationship, who is very satisfied with their relationship?
Republicans — 87 percent; Democrats — 76 percent

Who is very satisfied with their sex life?
Republicans — 56 percent; Democrats — 47 percent

The poll analysis also reveals who has worn something sexy to enhance their sex life:
Republicans — 72 percent; Democrats — 62 percent

When asked whether they had ever faked an orgasm, more
Democrats (33 percent) than Republicans (26 percent) said they had.

I guess random and rampant sex doesn't bring happiness after all. Ok, maybe that isn't fair, but the fact is, Democrats are depressed people. They are too negative. Everything in the world sucks (look at the way they talk about the president or big business) and there is always something to blame for their problems.

Are Republicans really better in bed? Probably not. What this survey shows is a general outlook on life.

Just be happy with what you have, which is a lot, considering we live in the freest and richest country God has given man. So lets keep America the way it is. Vote Republican.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Global Warming Caught Off Guard
DAMN GEORGE BUSH!!!

April is currently tracking as the coldest April in 113 years - a dramatic
change from last years #1 warmest ever. Even after some late month moderation,
April 2007 will likely keep the month in the top 7 coldest in history.
WHAT KIND OF MIND GAMES IS HE PLAYING WITH US!

First he makes the oil companies rich by invading Iraq, now he has coerced Mother Earth – through whom all blessings flow – into reversing global warming!

***SCREAM***

Seriously the global warming hysteria – as seen above – needs to stop.

Now I admit that the above quote doesn’t mean all that much. It’s like in sports, one game doesn’t mean anything. So is the weather. One month or even one year means little in terms of climate. This knee jerk reaction stuff needs to stop. It isn’t science – it is fear and politics.

If April had been the warmest on record, or one of the warmest on record, we wouldn’t hear the end of it. Now that it’s one of the coldest, we barely hear anything.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Friday, April 06, 2007
Unemployment Rate 4.4%
The unemployment rate is at historic lows despite President George Bush constantly trying to hurt brown and black people.

…the economy added 180,000 new jobs, dropping unemployment to a 4.4 percent rate that matched a five-year low.
Geez this economy sucks…so does G-Dub. I hate him so much! More from the article:

The rate for women held steady at 3.8 percent. The rate for men declined to 4 percent.

I’m not an expert statistician, but if the unemployment rate is 4% for men and 3.8% for women, how is the overall unemployment rate 4.4%? Oh...I forgot about the transgender freaks.

The unemployment rate for Hispanics dropped to 5.1 percent, a three-month low,
while the rate for blacks climbed to 8.3 percent, a three-month high.

Hmmmm…I wonder why this article doesn’t mention the unemployment rate for Asians? Actually…no I don’t. The reason they don’t mention the Asian unemployment rate is because it goes against the liberal media storyline of discrimination against minorities. Blacks and Hispanics have above average unemployment (so says the media and popular opinion) because of racism and lack of opportunity.

Unfortunately, Asians are more successful financially than whites. This obviously instantly defeats any argument used by libs regarding racism holding down minorities. That is, unless every single white person in the country got a memo that said to discriminate against blacks and Hispanics, but to leave Asians alone. I think the truth is clear, but rather than change their talking points, the libs simply ignore the fact of Asian success.

So why do blacks and Hispanics struggle financially? The answer is simple, but is too politically incorrect to mention in most places. However, here at the Conservative Bastion, we have the cojones to tell the truth.

The main difference is cultural values.

Being fully exposed to all cultures in America, let me enlighten you to the differences. *Note* these are generalized differences.

Asians and whites expect their children to go to college.

Blacks and Hispanics do not.

Blacks and Hispanics are more likely to grow up without a father.

Whites and Asians tend to have a father in the home.

Whites and Asians stress learning proper English.

Blacks and Hispanics do not. Every black person that I have ever known that spoke English well told me they were given crap for it by other blacks. They were often told something along the lines of, “you speak like a white person”. This is not a compliment.

This kind of attitude illustrates a major problem with blacks. If being educated makes you white, and white is bad…then you are screwed.

Hispanics…where to begin! I don’t know if it is out of pride or what, but these people like to hang on to the old language. They have duped the whole country into the idea that knowing two languages is a good thing. Frankly it is a waste of time unless you are an international businessperson or a translator.

A simplified language that every citizen can easily learn is what separates primitive cultures from civilized ones. If you have to go to school for years to learn the language(s) of the land, then you are wasting time, money, and human labor. Let’s face it, not that many Americans of any color are great at English. Average people have a hard enough time with one language. There is no point in having two.

To summarize…if you want to be successful in America, go to college, learn proper English, don’t have children in an uncommitted relationship (i.e. save it for marriage) and stop making so many fucking excuses.

If you can’t figure out a way to pay for college, then you are probably to stupid to make it in life anyways.

Lastly…

On the economy, just 38 percent approve of the president's stewardship while 60 percent disapprove, the poll shows.
Proving Americans, despite living in the best country God gave man, lack basic reasoning skills.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Clinton Lied, Babies Died
There’s a verse in the Old Testament somewhere that goes something like this:

'Saul has slain his thousands, and David his tens of thousands'

This text refers to the fact that King Saul of Israel was a warrior, but the up and coming –and soon-to-be King David – was a maniac.

The same is true for US presidents. After a few minutes of research today, I discovered that Bush has killed his tens of thousands, and Clinton his millions.

This is in stark contrast to popular belief that President Bush is a warmongering, oil hungry, monster whose only purpose in life is to make money off of the deaths of poor people…especially if they are brown or black.

What’s that? You don’t believe me? Well here you go…

Bush’s Kill Count

▪ 69,000 dead in Iraq…that includes Coalition as well as civilian deaths.

▪ 5,000 dead in Afghanistan…that is just an estimate, but includes civilians and Coalition forces.

Honestly, off the top of my head, I can't think of any other killing sprees that George Bush has gone on. Email me if you know of some that I have missed. If anyone tries to tell me 9/11, I will personally report you to the Bush secret police.

Clinton’s Kill Count

▪ 3 million dead in North Korea…in a stroke of genius, Bill Clinton imposed sanctions on North Korea that starved 3 million people to death. Great going bud.

▪ 500,000 babies dead in IraqUNICEF says so, so I guess it is official…Bill Clinton is a baby killer.

To sum up the final death count of each presidency, let me preface it with saying that there are probably dozens of other instances where these two presidents have had serious negative effects that led to death. However, I don’t know everything, so I only counted the major conflicts I knew about.

Also, I understand that American presidents have a lot of power. No matter who is president, people will die somewhere in the world in a circumstance where you could make the argument that they were directly or indirectly responsible.

In other words, I don’t think either is actually a murderer. I do believe, however, that people that call George Bush a Nazi or fascist are extremely annoying and woefully misinformed. This blog is meant for those who believe George Bush is bad, but think Clinton is good.

Thankfully, such black and white childlike logic doesn’t exist here at Conservative Bastion, and we are doing our best to educate the masses in the most balanced and fully informed way possible.

Clinton Final Score: 3.5 million dead

Bush Final Score: 74,000 dead


P.S. As for the whole "Clinton Lied, Babies Died"...read this.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
Michael Crichton Owns Environmentalists
Why is Michael Crichton so freaking smart? Follow the link and you can read the rest of this speech. The speech is 3 1/2 years old and he has since written a book on the subject.

Today, one of the most powerful religions in the Western World is environmentalism. Environmentalism seems to be the religion of choice for urban atheists. Why do I say it's a religion? Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remapping of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and myths.

There's an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there's a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all. We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability. Sustainability is salvation in the church of the environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide-free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs, imbibe.

Eden, the fall of man, the loss of grace, the coming doomsday---these are deeply held mythic structures. They are profoundly conservative beliefs. They may even be hard-wired in the brain, for all I know. I certainly don't want to talk anybody out of them, as I don't want to talk anybody out of a belief that Jesus Christ is the son of God who rose from the dead. But the reason I don't want to talk anybody out of these beliefs is that I know that I can't talk anybody out of them. These are not facts that can be argued. These are issues of faith.

And so it is, sadly, with environmentalism. Increasingly it seems facts aren't necessary, because the tenets of environmentalism are all about belief. It's about whether you are going to be a sinner, or saved. Whether you are going to be one of the people on the side of salvation, or on the side of doom. Whether you are going to be one of us, or one of them.

Am I exaggerating to make a point? I am afraid not. Because we know a lot more about the world than we did forty or fifty years ago. And what we know now is not so supportive of certain core environmental myths, yet the myths do not die. Let's examine some of those beliefs.

There is no Eden. There never was. What was that Eden of the wonderful mythic past? Is it the time when infant mortality was 80%, when four children in five died of disease before the age of five? When one woman in six died in childbirth? When the average lifespan was 40, as it was in America a century ago. When plagues swept across the planet, killing millions in a stroke. Was it when millions starved to death? Is that when it was Eden?

Beautiful.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Liberal College Kids Get Violent
Liberals really know how to be nice and accept others despite their personal beliefs…

White House Advisor Karl Rove was the target of a protest on the American University campus Tuesday night, News4 reported.

Rove was on the campus to talk to the College Republicans, but when he got outside more than a dozen students began throwing things at his car, an American University spokesperson said.
I have two points:

1. I would be willing to bet that these kids don’t even know what Karl Rove does, or why they hate him. Rove is a boogey man for liberals, and just like the boogey man, they fear him because they have been told to. They don’t actually know him or anything about him.

2. The end of this article mentions that there were no arrests made. This is no doubt a byproduct of the inherent understanding and compassion of real conservatives. Rove understands that these kids are mindless morons with no understanding of how things actually work. His forgiveness for the transgression of a few dumb college kids is admirable. Personally, I would have got out of the car and busted some skulls.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
Thank God Al Gore Lost in 2000
This news is a month old by now, but it just recently caught my attention. The following comments are from Al Gore regarding media coverage of global warming.

"I believe that is one of the principal reasons why political leaders around the world have not yet taken action," Gore said. "There are many reasons, but one of the principal reasons in my view is more than half of the mainstream media have rejected the scientific consensus implicitly — and I say 'rejected,' perhaps it's the wrong word. They have failed to report that it is the consensus and instead have chosen … balance as bias.
I think I understand why liberals hate Fox News so much now. Balance is bias. Of course!

"I don't think that any of the editors or reporters responsible for one of these stories saying, 'It may be real, it may not be real,' is unethical.
In other words, giving both sides of the story is now bias. You must only report what Al Gore wants reported. Anything else is unethical. All hail King Gore – his word is law. Don’t you dare question him.

I think I have made my point. Anyone that calls President Bush a Nazi can now be fair and balanced and call Gore one as well. I am waiting for your responses.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Monday, April 02, 2007
Rosie O'Donnell Flip Flops on Kindness and Acceptance
The Fat One has a hard time keeping her mouth shut…

On her blog at Rosie.com, Ro accused [Bill] O'Reilly of being a totalitarian puppet of News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch, as she put it, in her lower-case verse, "like 1984/molding the facts/2 suit the needs/of big brother rupert." And Rosie also revealed that when she and co-host Joy Behar made reference on "The View" to a sex scandal involving O'Reilly, they were told they had to can it about O'Reilly or else "bill o would 'go after' all the hosts" of their show.
Comments like this really annoy me. This is coming from someone who says they are liberal. Liberals love to talk about how nice and understanding and nuanced they are. However, comments like this show that the concept of liberal understanding, tolerance, and niceness are over hyped.

Let me elaborate.

Anyone can accept someone who is exactly like them. For instance, here at Conservative Bastion, we have an easy time accepting religious, conservative, and obnoxiously patriotic people. We don’t, however, have an easy time accepting liberals, gays, and brown people (it’s a joke calm down).

Because of this, conservatives often get labeled as closed minded or hateful.

Ironically, obese lesbians like Rosie prove that liberals are no more tolerant than conservatives. Sure she accepts gays, browns and liberals, but that is who she is. Of course she accepts those people. The question is whether or not she can accept Christians, conservatives and people who are prejudice.

Just a refresher, this is what she had to say about Christianity not too long ago…

…radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America.
If by radical, you mean people who are willing to kill civilians to advance a political cause, then of course she is right. In which case, radical lesbianism would be just as much a threat to this country and radical Islam.

Fortunately, the neither radical Christianity, nor radical lesbianism exist in this country. If anything, it’s the eco-terrorists who threaten this country, not Christian terrorists.

You see, the Fat Slob suffers from something that liberals often pretend to hate.

The fact is, she sees the world in black and white.

There is no other explanation as to why her comments and views could be so radical. It is because she thinks she is right, and everyone else is wrong. I can actually respect that, but don’t give me that “nuanced” bullshit or that lame “you see the world in black and white when it is in many shades of grey” speech. That is the absolute lamest speech ever. Everyone thinks they are right and the other guy is wrong. Everyone sees the world in black and white.

The fact is, she accepts people like her, and thinks people who aren’t like her are wrong or strange. In other words, she is human. There is nothing about liberals that makes them nicer or more tolerant. It is a lie. A damn good lie, but a lie nonetheless.

*****************************************************************************

I recently witnessed lesbian doublespeak firsthand on the Bravo network. There is an interesting show called Work Out on that channel that shows the life of a lesbian woman, Jackie, who runs a gym in L.A. Her mother is a conservative Christian and believes homosexuality is a sin. Her mom, however, still loves her ***SHOCK*** and was visiting her in L.A. in one of the episodes I saw.

Long story short, Jackie’s friends are all gay and were ganging up on her mother in hopes to convince her that she was wrong about homosexuality. It was interesting to see how patient the mother was and how mean and obnoxious all the gays were.

Perhaps the most interesting scene was when Jackie talked about her hopes of one day having a child and mentioned that she hoped to instill in the child (paraphrasing) love, acceptance, and some other liberal nonsense word. I say nonsense because they act as if conservatives raise their children with the hopes of them being filled with hate, oppression, and stupidity.

The fact is that she really just wants a child that accepts homosexuality and liberal ideas. Not someone that is truly universally accepting.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!