Conservative Bastion
The only blog that can factually claim to shift the Bell Curve, along with the hearts & minds of America, to the right.
Sunday, December 10, 2006
Clinton Bugged Princess Diana

Clinton bugged a lot of women, but it’s not what you think. A new report regarding the death of Princess Diana reveals some interesting information.

The American secret service was bugging Princess Diana's telephone conversations without the approval of the British security services on the night she died, according to the most comprehensive report on her death, to be published this week.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with the death of Princess Diana, let me shift your position on the Bell Curve to the right.

Princess Diana died in a car accident in 1997. The president of the US at the time was Clinton. Using the logic of many Bush Administration detractors, there can only be one possible conclusion from the leaking of this information. Remember, it is impossible for anything bad to happen in government without the president knowing about and most likely ordering it.

President Clinton obviously knew that this bugging took place. TRUST ME, HE KNEW. Apparently, he maliciously bugged leaders of other countries with a complete lack of regard for international harmony. He most likely did this without consulting the other braches of government, which makes him a dictator and a fascist. Unfortunately, we will never know how many leaders he bugged since he circumvented the law.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
6 Comments:
Blogger Democrat said...
Yeah, Media, every single, solitary thing the FBI and CIA do the president knows about -- right. Good call. Oh, and BTW, why don't you go read that story again, without the slant this time.

Democrat

Blogger halliburton said...
democrat, I think that was partly his point.

The far left treats Bush like he's always plotting something terrible. When something goes wrong (Abu Ghraib, Hurricane Katrina, etc.) they claim that the president and his evil cronies planned it.

But when we find out that something happened while Clinton was president, everyone assumes he must not have known. That it was purely an accident.

This is an ex-president who obviously lied to the world under oath and who has been accused multiple times of PERSONALLY sexually harassing people and even of raping someone. And who was actually caught lying under oath about it. I'm no judge, but it seems to me that people don't lie under oath unless they have something to hide. (I mention these things only to point out that we know he is not a completely trustworthy person, and if he's lied about this, there's no reason to believe it couldn't have happened any other time)

Still nobody on the left is going to question why Princess Diana's phone was being tapped. And the idea that Clinton had any knowledge of it will be viewed as absurd.

If something like this were to happen in this administration, you know that people would be raising the Bush=Hitler banner right away, and news stations would be asking leading questions about what this could mean for Bush's approval ratings as if he was the one that did it, etc.

That's not very fair. So it's good of you to notice the slant and maybe you'll notice it from the left's side in the future as well.

Blogger Democrat said...
First of all, it's the loons that think Bush blew up the levies and blew up the towers -- that isn't the left, that's the loony-tunes. Secondly, Bush is a crook and it has nothing to do with Diana, Abu Ghraib, etc... it has something to do with a lot else. Thirdly, Bush lied multiple times. Remember, though, nobody died when Clinton lied. Lastly, I don't care why her phone was tapped. Clinton was a good man and did excellent for this country. The numbers prove it -- the numbers in the polls prove it, etc... Bush's approval is like 30 something percent. At this point in his presidency, Ronald Regan (good man) was 49%. Do you know what Bill Clinton's approval rating was with two years left? 64% (look it up)... People know that when Clinton was in office, they were fine. More than fine. And Regan was a helluva president, too. His numbers aren't as good as Clinton's, but Regan was what we needed at the time. He was a damn good man and I would have voted for him... To hell with Iran-Contra... Most presidents have scandals. Clinton is an idol of mine, and he has the Lewinsky scandal. Nobody is perfect, but Bush is a pig --- he's no Regan, and certainly no Clinton.

Democrat

Blogger Democrat said...
Oh, and BTW, I do recognize when the left puts a slant on things. I recognize it just fine. Just the other day I read an article about a speech Bush gave, and the article pointed out something Bush said and after you read it you were like "What a dick!" But once you heard the actual speech, you realized Bush wasn't being a dick about it at all, but the Liberal Newspaper made it seem that way. Trust me, I recognize it. Still, Bush is a pig. I'm able to discern.

Democrat

Blogger Democrat said...
One more thing... You guys are good guys. Media, halliburton. I mean, I don't adhere to your political beliefs but you guys are nice, and to be candid the only person who gets ridiculous sometimes -- I admit -- is me. I do appreciate the fact that you guys are cool about the way you express your opinions. You guys are good Republicans and that's something I've not found often. So I apologize because I know I start swearing and such sometimes, but I just get so heated, LOL. I've had toooo much of Bush, I suppose. But, beside all that, you guys are good people. Thanks for being good and allowing me to express my views on this Conservative blog.

Democrat

Blogger Media Tycoon said...
no prob buddy.

Links to this post:
Create a Link