Conservative Bastion
The only blog that can factually claim to shift the Bell Curve, along with the hearts & minds of America, to the right.
Friday, October 27, 2006
Brazilian Politics
I was reading the WSJ this morning and came across an article regarding Brazil’s presidential election. From what I read, I saw a similar formula to what we see in American politics. The poorer, darker, and less educated you are, the more likely you are to vote left. The richer, better educated, and lighter you are, the more likely you are to vote right.

In Brazil, the leftists have power now. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is the “blue-collar” president and is being challenged by Geraldo Alckmin.

Just like in America, the leftists seem to scapegoat the rich minority for the problems of the poor. Here’s a little sample:

Mr. da Silva has further heightened class tensions by arguing that corruption cases in his government are being blown out of proportion because of his humble background. "There is a reason I'm being persecuted," Mr. da Silva said last week. "It's a matter of skin, of social origin." He rails against "a small minority that has leeched from the country for 500 years."

What’s also interesting is that there is a geographical split in the country. Just like the good old days in America, it’s north versus south.

Mr. da Silva is the overwhelming favorite of voters in the sprawling, arid Northeast, where he himself was born and people tend to be poorer, less educated and darker-skinned than those in the South. The South, which encompasses Brazil's most modern and glamorous cities and its media centers, has been considerably cooler to Mr. da Silva.

Perhaps the best bit of information this article provided was this:

College-educated Brazilians, like the students in São Paulo who recently dressed up as clowns to satirize Mr. da Silva, often look down on a president who quit school after the fourth grade. But the vast majority of Brazilians with only a basic education embrace him.

This proves two things:

1. All over the world, the uneducated vote for liberals. In other words, this is not an American phenomenon.

2. No matter what you think about President Bush, there are other world leaders dumber than him.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Thursday, October 19, 2006
Abortion Vote in South Dakota
This is what I consider the most interesting aspect of the coming election:

Abortion-rights activists in South Dakota took many by surprise a few months ago when they said voters should decide the fate of the state’s new abortion law, the most restrictive in the US.

Now, with a referendum on the November 7 ballot, their campaign has become the frontline in the long-running national debate on abortion.

A victory here would show that even in a conservative Midwestern state, the public will not tolerate a near-total ban on abortion. But a defeat would signal just how difficult a challenge campaigners face in trying to protect a woman’s right to abortion.

While they bristle at the attention, the South Dakota activists are counting on residents of this old frontier state to prove them right.

For those who don’t know, I am mildly pro-choice because I do not know of any other sane alternative. Throwing evil mothers or doctors in jail may be tempting, but it won’t be when we turn abortion into a situation similar to the war on drugs. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, 53.6% (94,578) of the inmates in Federal prison are there for drug offenses. I understand that drugs and abortion are different, but I think its safe to say that when our drug laws were written, no one really expected this to become the priority of Federal law enforcement and imprisonment.

Making new and strict laws will have unintended consequences and we should think long and hard about any new laws that try to limit abortion.

That being said, I hope the voters pass this law. Not because I want to ban abortion everywhere, but because I think Roe V. Wade was a horrible decision. There is no constitutional right to an abortion. Abortion was in no one’s mind when the 14th amendment was passed (I know because I was there).

I better watch myself, or I may become anti-abortion again.

If you don't want to ruin your day, don't go to Google, don't type "abortion", and don't do a picture search. It is too late for me. **GAG**

Back on point, this vote interests the hell out of me. I guess as a Republican, I don't have much else to look forward to. More on that next time.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Those Classy Libs

Another classy example of the type of tolerance conservatives should emulate.

A ranking Democrat in the House of Representative is apologizing for saying an African-American Senate candidate "slavishly" supported the Republican Party.

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, said he meant no offense when he made the remark about Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, the GOP nominee for the seat being vacated by longtime Democratic Sen. Paul Sarbanes.

Hoyer's statement was prejudice, degrading, and promotes groupthink. He compared someone whose views he disagrees with to a slave – insinuating that Steele is stupid or unable to think on his own. How could that statement NOT offend him?

While Hoyer apologized for the comments, he continued to criticize Steele's support of the GOP.

Why is Hoyer criticizing Steele’s support for the GOP and not his general beliefs or ideas? The answer is simple. Steele is a black Republican, and many blacks consider that as some sort of treason. In other words, you must think like them, or you are not truly black.

"But Mr. Steele continuously tries to divert attention from the fact that he is an unwavering supporter of the Republican agenda and of President Bush and Vice President Cheney."

I can only assume that Hoyer is “unwavering” is his support for the Democratic agenda. What’s the difference? Steele is a Republican. It is a sick attitude. The idea that anyone has to think a certain way based on the color of their skin is absurd. Some people need to wake up to the 21st century.

If Mike Tyson can do it, anyone can.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Sunday, October 15, 2006
The Future of Racism in America
White racism is over – but a new racism is becoming more prevalent.

Four schools near Fontana High School went on lockdown Friday after a riot broke out at the high school.

Students said the brawl began at lunch after someone pulled a fire alarm, sending hundreds of students into an open quad.

Black and Latino students shouted racial slurs at one another and exchanged blows, students said.

Officers from city and county agencies — some in protective helmets wielding beanbag shotguns — helped school police break up the fights over the course of two hours.

Fontana police reported no injuries. Officials were investigating whether the incident was racially motivated.

For anyone who keeps up with the California news, you know this is not an isolated incident. Essentially, at least in California, there is a generation of young Hispanics and blacks who hate each other to the point of turning violent.

One of the articles I found on this story had this picture to go along with it. Apparently, it shows two black kids running from a mob of Hispanics.

Good luck solving this issue.

It is ironic that these types of problems happen in liberal California, but aren't as big of a problem in conservative/racist Texas.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Friday, October 13, 2006
Blame the Economy on Bush
Some recent economic news needs to be blamed on President Bush…
The nation's unemployment rate fell to 4.6 percent last month, down from 4.7 in August, and average wages rose by 4 percent over the previous year -- the best performance for both measures in five years.
Democrats have been arguing that wages have been rising too slowly under President Bush. They should know better than to blame the Bush for this, but they do it anyways.

After September 11, the United States was in a recession and nothing could stop that. There is no magical policy that Clinton had that Bush doesn’t know about. Once a recession starts, the only thing you can do is cut taxes, drastically increase spending, and hope for the best. Bush did both and we got out of the recession relatively quickly. It is hard to argue against this.

When the country goes in recession, it is usually because consumers stop buying. When this happens, companies make less money. When companies make less money, they have to cut their costs. Some companies lose enough money and are forced to layoff workers. Others may be able to survive by giving smaller than normal or no raises to their current workers. This is such a basic concept that it makes me sick to think that some people can’t figure this out on their own.

As the country comes out of a recession, companies start to make more money. As this happens, they can hire more workers. As the available labor force gets smaller, wages go up because companies must fight to get the workers of their choice.

Every time the US goes into recession, it takes a while to fully recover. You can’t fix an economy overnight NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO. The national economy is complicated and has many factors influencing the direction it goes in. There is no magic bean or button that can solve the problem. You can’t attack Wal-Mart and force them to pay their workers more. That isn’t how it works.

I know my Democratic friends think that companies should raise their employees salaries first, then worry about balanced checkbooks later, but that leads to more ENRONS. You people can’t have it both ways. Businesses can’t just raise the salaries of their workers whenever they want.

This economy is growing, and everyone should be happy about that. We should also understand that growing an economy takes time. So chill out and be realistic about your expectations.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Thursday, October 12, 2006
Democrats Lead in Fascist Takeover
The mayor of Chicago recently advocated for police state. For those of you who don’t know, the current mayor of Chicago is Richard M. Daley. He is the son of the infamous Chicago mayor, Richard J. Daley. His father is known most for running his Democratic political machine in Chicago that stole the 1960 presidential election for JFK by getting the dead to vote. He was also known for being racist against blacks, corruption, and anti-democratic.

However, in all fairness, we should not judge Daley Jr. on his fathers sins. Anyways, this is what he had to say.

Security and terrorism won't be an issue if Chicago wins the right to host the 2016 Summer Olympic Games because, by that time, there'll be a surveillance camera on every corner, Mayor Daley said Wednesday.

"By the time 2016 [rolls around], we'll have more cameras than Washington, D.C. ... Our technology is more advanced than any other city in the world -- even compared to London -- dealing with our cameras and the sophistication of cameras and retro-fitting all the cameras downtown in new buildings, doing the CTA cameras," Daley said.

"By 2016, I'll make you a bet. We'll have [cameras on] almost every block."

I'm not sure who we should blame for this, but I'm going to guess Bush is to blame. He is out of control. Now he is getting Democrats to buy into his brand of fascism. God help us. Stolen elections, police state, and nepotism...the Daley dynasty is almost a carbon copy of President Bush's "fascism". The second holocaust is right around the corner.

In all seriousness, my point is this: the Democratic record in Chicago more closely resembles fascism than anything Bush has done. There is no dispute over whether there was a concerted effort to steal election for Democrats in Chicago. It happened...PERIOD. There is only one political party in Chicago. Now with an all-out police state, the fascist recipe is all but complete.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Monday, October 09, 2006
North Korea Tests Nuke?

It looks like North Korea has the bomb…or do they? They conducted a “nuclear test” this weekend, but there seems to be some question as to what caused the explosion.

Like earthquakes, large explosions send out shockwaves that can be detected on seismographs. Big nuclear bombs make big waves, with clear signatures that make them fairly easy to detect, analyze and confirm that they were caused by splitting atoms. But smaller blasts _ as North Korea's appears to have been _ are trickier to break down.

This leaves a couple possibilities. Either North Korea faked the test with conventional explosives, or their nuclear bomb turned out to be a dud. I suppose it is also possible that the test went perfectly well, and our instruments malfunctioned/Bush lied.

His agency estimated the North Korean blast at around 1 kiloton or less _ equivalent to the explosive force of 1,000 tons of TNT. For a nuclear device, that would be so weak that the French defense minister suggested that "there could have been a failure" with the North Korean reported test.

As much as I would like to believe they faked the whole thing, it seems unrealistic to believe they would fake a nuclear blast with such a small amount of explosives. Surely they know that they couldn’t fake a nuclear detonation with merely 1,000 tons of TNT.

This particular event aside, it is important to note why North Korea seeks nuclear weapons in the first place. Their goal is to create an impossible situation for the United States – and they have succeeded. More specifically, they want to make it impossible for the US to invade them, and that’s what they have – with or without the nuke.

For those of you who don’t know why this is read this, but here is a little sample:

The biggest military concern in striking North Korean nuclear facilities is the threat of North Korean counter-attacks. Seoul, the South Korean capitol, lies within range of North Korean long-range artillery. Five hundred 170mm Koksan guns and 200 multiple-launch rocket systems could hit Seoul with artillery shells and chemical weapons, causing panic and massive civilian casualties. North Korea has between 500 and 600 Scud missiles that could strike targets throughout South Korea with conventional warheads or chemical weapons.

Obviously, adding a handful of nukes to this already potent arsenal would do much for the North Korean military.

That being said, I am not sure if we should be afraid of North Korea. Kim Jong-Il knows that if he launches a nuke, his rule will end and he will die. He will not allow that to happen.

North Korea will only be a huge threat if they start selling weapons to terrorists. Until then, I think we have bigger problems.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Real Fascism

Here is a little wakeup call for all the political know-nothings in the US. How many times have we heard nonsense about Bush controlling the media? Such a claim could only be made by someone with no grasp of reality.

Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, an outspoken critic of President Vladimir Putin, was shot dead on Saturday at her apartment block in central Moscow, police said.

Chilling...to say the least.

"The first thing that comes to mind is that Anna was killed for her professional activities. We don't see any other motive for this terrible crime," said Vitaly Yaroshevsky, a deputy editor of the newspaper where Politkovskaya worked.

I could be mistaken, but I’m not aware of any journalist being killed for opposing President Bush’s policies.

Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, a shareholder in Politkovskaya's newspaper Novaya Gazeta, called the killing a "savage crime."

"It is a blow to the entire democratic, independent press," Gorbachev told Interfax news agency. "It is a grave crime against the country, against all of us."

This is kind of odd. If you read my post two weeks ago, you know that Gorby is talking out of both sides of his mouth.

Politkovskya is quoted in the article regarding her views on President Putin: "I dislike him for ... his cynicism, for his racism, for his lies ... for the massacre of the innocents…"

This sounds like the Daily Kos talking about President Bush.

…she wrote in her book "Putin's Russia" which was published overseas but not in Russia.

This doesn’t sound familiar. Has Bush banned any books recently?

Her death came on the day Putin turned 54.

I am not aware of any anti-Bush reporters being killed for his birthday…

Bottom-line: Before you infer that Bush is a Nazi, look at history (or present) and put your ideas in some sort of context. Anyone can say anything about the President of the United States without disappearing or paying a fine. In fact, news reporters would probably see their ratings go up for doing it (as seen with Keith Olbermann).

Remember what drives the media in today’s world: money. Some (a.k.a. idiots/Democrats) say this is bad and proves that we should have a state run news media. We always hear them bitch and moan about PBS and NPR losing funding. (I feel like quoting JT, but I won’t.) I guess their basic idea is that if the government funds the news, it will ensure that there is no conflict of interest with advertisers and will help avoid the dumbing down of programming (again, I am just guessing because this makes no sense to me).

The problem with this childish idealism is that it neglects one important fact: everyone has something that motivates them. Every reporter, producer, and script writer has an agenda in every newsroom. If you understand this, then you will understand that money may be the lesser of many evils.

In a situation where you have state run media, one party could (theoretically) control the slant of the news. This is very bad and should be avoided at all costs.

This is almost what exists in Russia today. There aren’t a lot of news media options. That’s what allows one reporter who does speak out to be an easy target.

I don’t care what anyone else says, I believe the American media is still the best in the world. Even if it wasn’t, a lot of us can still get foreign news fairly easily (BBC, Al-Jazeera, etc.).

The only way to ensure a truly independent media is to allow anyone to report on whatever they want, whenever they want. If certain people can make money off of it, let them do it. It's not a big deal. The fact is that if you want to know information, you can learn it. You may want to avoid CNN or Fox News when it's time to find out good info, but there are many good sources at our disposal. Forget government regulations, it will only lead to more government control, which will lead to more dead reporters.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Drive-By Media Does it Again

The drive-by media is at it again, and I have to admit, I fell for it too. The reason I waited to blog about the perverted congressman was because I didn’t want to get caught up in a bunch of hype. So of course, the day after I decided to blog about it, the truth comes out. It turns out that the sick instant message exchange I posted two days ago took place between the congressman and an 18-year-old. Yes, he was an adult.

All this aside, I am beginning to think that there may be many hypocrites regarding this congressman’s actions. Many liberals seem to think that conservatives go overboard when prosecuting the hot blonde teachers that rape their 14-year-old students.

The difference between these situations is that all congressman Foley did was talk dirty online with an adult…at least from what we know so far. Who knows how much of this case will turn out to be a bunch of nonsense. This is another botched story by the media. What a surprise.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Bush Recruits Superman to Fascist Agenda
I, your humble correspondent, took this picture this summer in Hollywood. At first I thought it had something to do with the Superman movie, but after months of deep thought, it all came together. Bush has recruited Superman. It’s obvious.


Doesn’t it remind you of something else?

God help us…

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Republican Congressman Exposed as Child Predator
What a disgrace...

Xxxxxxxxx (8:01:23 PM): i have a cast fetish

Maf54 (8:01:27 PM): well tell me

Maf54 (8:01:32 PM): cast

Xxxxxxxxx (8:01:44 PM): ya like…plaster cast

Maf54 (8:01:49 PM): ok..so what happens

Maf54 (8:01:58 PM): how does that turn you in

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:02 PM): i dont know

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:04 PM): it just does

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:08 PM): ive never had one

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:16 PM): but people that have them turn me on

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:27 PM): and if i had one it would probably turn me on

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:29 PM): beats me

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:32 PM): its kinda weird

Xxxxxxxxx (8:02:50 PM): but along with that i like the whole catholic girl look….thats our schools uniform

Maf54 (8:03:02 PM): ha thats wild

Xxxxxxxxx (8:03:14 PM): ya but now im hard

Maf54 (8:03:32 PM): me 2

Maf54 (8:03:42 PM): cast got you going

Maf54 (8:03:47 PM): what you wearing

Xxxxxxxxx (8:04:04 PM): normal clothes

Xxxxxxxxx (8:04:09 PM): tshirt and shorts

Maf54 (8:04:17 PM): um so a big buldge

Xxxxxxxxx (8:04:35 PM): ya

Maf54 (8:04:45 PM): um

Maf54 (8:04:58 PM): love to slip them off of you

Xxxxxxxxx (8:05:08 PM): haha

Maf54 (8:05:53 PM): and gram the one eyed snake

Maf54 (8:06:13 PM): grab

Xxxxxxxxx (8:06:53 PM): not tonight…dont get to excited

Maf54 (8:07:12 PM): well your hard

Xxxxxxxxx (8:07:45 PM): that is true

Maf54 (8:08:03 PM): and a little horny

Xxxxxxxxx (8:08:11 PM): and also tru

Maf54 (8:08:31 PM): get a ruler and measure it for me

Xxxxxxxxx (8:08:38 PM): ive already told you that

Maf54 (8:08:47 PM): tell me again

Xxxxxxxxx (8:08:49 PM): 7 and 1/2

Maf54 (8:09:04 PM): ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Maf54 (8:09:08 PM): beautiful

Xxxxxxxxx (8:09:38 PM): lol

Maf54 (8:09:44 PM): thats a great size

Xxxxxxxxx (8:10:00 PM): thank you

Maf54 (8:10:22 PM): still stiff

Xxxxxxxxx (8:10:28 PM): ya

Maf54 (8:10:40 PM): take it out

Xxxxxxxxx (8:10:54 PM): brb…my mom is yelling

Maf54 (8:11:06 PM): ok

Xxxxxxxxx (8:14:02 PM): back

Maf54 (8:14:37 PM): cool hope se didnt see any thing


StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Sunday, October 01, 2006
Do Quit Your Day Job

This transcript comes from a reaction that MSNBC leftwing propaganda fiend, Keith Olbermann, had to a Donald Rumsfeld speech a month ago. I wrote about the Rumsfeld speech when it happened. It was a great speech. Olbermann’s reaction would be comical if it weren’t for many American’s buying into his monkey logic.

The main message of that Olbermann seems to convey is that people who believe in absolutes are always dumb. He also voices his concern over people who challenge the intelligence, morality, and patriotism of others. To help illustrate this, he talks about the Bush administration being intellectually confused, their lack of morality, and how they are destroying the country.

In case you are wondering, no, it doesn’t make sense. It really is a debate between Olbermann and himself. You can also watch Olbermann in action on YouTube.

Olbermann’s nonsensical tirade begins like this…

The man who sees absolutes, where all other men see nuances and shades of meaning, is either a prophet, or a quack.

Donald H. Rumsfeld is not a prophet.

In other words, if you view the answer of certain issues in black and white, you are a quack. Last time I checked, that is an absolute. Therefore, by his own logic, Olbermann is a quack.

We’ll give him a break. Everyone makes mistakes.

Mr. Rumsfeld’s remarkable speech to the American Legion yesterday demands the deep analysis—and the sober contemplation—of every American.

For it did not merely serve to impugn the morality or intelligence — indeed, the loyalty — of the majority of Americans who oppose the transient occupants of the highest offices in the land.

Ok that seems fair…right? His problem is that he later countered this statement and said…

Mr. Rumsfeld is also personally confused, morally or intellectually, about his own standing in this matter.

He then flip-flopped back to his original position and attacked Rumsfeld again.

And yet he [Rumsfeld] can stand up, in public, and question the morality and the intellect of those of us who dare ask just for the receipt for the Emperor’s New Clothes?

And again…

That, about which Mr. Rumsfeld is confused is simply this: This is a Democracy. Still. Sometimes just barely.

After this, he then decided to question Rumsfeld’s patriotism…

In what country was Mr. Rumsfeld raised? As a child, of whose heroism did he read? On what side of the battle for freedom did he dream one day to fight? With what country has he confused the United States of America?

Again…

The confusion is about whether this Secretary of Defense, and this administration, are in fact now accomplishing what they claim the terrorists seek: The destruction of our freedoms, the very ones for which the same veterans Mr. Rumsfeld addressed yesterday in Salt Lake City, so valiantly fought.

Again…

This country faces a new type of fascism - indeed.

And again…

Quoting Edward R. Murrow, Olbermann says that "never in the trial of a thousand years of writing could I come close to matching how he phrased a warning to an earlier generation of us, at a time when other politicians thought they (and they alone) knew everything, and branded those who disagreed: 'confused' or 'immoral.'"

I wonder how Olbermann justifies his "Worst Person in the World" segment? What a rollercoaster. It isn’t over yet though.

That government, like Mr. Rumsfeld’s, had a monopoly on all the facts. It, too, had the “secret information.” It alone had the true picture of the threat. It too dismissed and insulted its critics in terms like Mr. Rumsfeld’s — questioning their intellect and their morality.

Olbermann obviously suffers from a severe disconnect from reality. A monopoly on the facts? Is that possible today? Is he aware of the internet? What a douche.

We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty,” he said, in 1954.

I think Olbermann is confusing disloyalty with dissent. Again Olbermann evokes Edward R. Murrow...

“We must remember always that accusation is not proof, and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law.”

So accusing the president of lying doesn’t mean its true…got it. More Murrow…

We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason…

Like believing that driving our cars will destroy the planet? Olbermann used one last Murrow quote…

… if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men, not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate, and to defend causes that were for the moment unpopular.

Right on Murrow. Like defending Wal-Mart’s right to conduct business against do-nothing politicians with economic ignoramuses as constituents?

The difference between liberals and conservatives is simple. Libs fear monger about economics, conservatives fear monger about terrorists. Terrorists kill, Wal-Mart sells you products for cheap prices. Decide for yourself who is on the right side of history and who is completely out of touch with reality.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!